Holistic osteoarthritis physiotherapy, rehabilitation after surgery and pain clinic: Reading & London. and web clinics across the UK by arrangement

SPECIALIST OSTEOARTHRITIS PROGRAMMES

SPECIALIST OSTEOARTHRITIS SUPPORT

  •  
  • Primary osteoarthritis
  • Secondary osteoarthritis
  • Pre and post surgery for OA
  • Osteoarthritis pain

Holistic osteoarthritis physiotherapy, including somatic psychotherapeutics for anxiety and depression, exercise rehabilitation after surgery and pain clinic. Modern approach, integrating trauma informed care and bespoke programmes targeting lifestyle and future health.

Specialist Integrated Treatment for Problems Associated with Osteoarthritis :

Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common long-term musculoskeletal conditions and, since the late 1970s, supporting individuals with OA has been a significant part of my clinical work.

As a student, I recognised connections between joint problems, pain, movement, confidence, stress, lifestyle, previous injury, emotional health, work demands and social circumstances. I instinctively understood that these systems interacted with one another, especially the impact that environment, work, relationships and trauma could have on how well someone functioned and coped.

At that time, this broader way of thinking sat well outside the traditional medical model and was often met with scepticism. Even in 1999, when science began opening towards qualitative research exploring perception, lived experience and patient narrative, medical practice itself remained highly divided rather than genuinely integrative.

Now it’s 2026, and although some areas of medicine now refer to holism, and biopsychosocial approaches, much of the UK healthcare system still functions through a separation of body and mind — but not within my practice. I’m qualified across mind and body practices, acknowledge the impact of outer system events on the inner systems within, it’s obvious.

Decades of working within rehabilitation and complex recovery settings continually reinforced for me that joints and pain could not be understood in isolation from the wider real life of the person, or from the effects of lifestyle, environment, finances and community upon them.

I’ve steadfastly pursued that holistic premise for over 40 years and carried the perspective into work involving persistent pain, orthopaedic rehabilitation, CRPS, neurological rehabilitation, bone health and complex life-changing injuries. Over time, as technology has evolved, research has taken increasing interest in these wider influences and has progressively supported much of what I observed throughout clinical practice. Long-term musculoskeletal problems are influenced by interconnected biological, psychological and social factors.

Today this wider perspective is recognised within biopsychosocial, trauma-informed and whole-person rehabilitation approaches. Although there is still a long way to go before a genuinely integrated all-systems approach becomes standard practice. However there is one place you get whole person, whole life care, and that’s here, at my practice.

Osteoarthritis is the most common form of arthritis in the world — and yet for the millions of people living with it, that prevalence rarely makes it feel less isolating

There are several different classification of Osteoarthritis

Primary Osteoarthritis

Primary osteoarthritis is the most common form of arthritis overall, often referred to as ‘wear and tear’ and strongly associated with ageing.

Primary osteoarthritis develops without a single identifiable cause. Instead it arises from the gradual interplay of age, genetics, weight, muscle weakness, hormonal changes, and biomechanical loading that together disturb the normal balance of cartilage, bone, and joint tissue over time.

It can affect a single joint — most commonly the knees, hips, hands, spine, or feet — or multiple joints simultaneously, a presentation known as generalised or polyarticular osteoarthritis, which carries a greater overall health burden.

Primary osteoarthritis is not simply wear and tear of bone. It is a disease of the whole joint, involving cartilage, subchondral bone (bone under cartilage), synovium, ligaments, and surrounding soft tissue.

As primary osteoarthritis progresses the cartilage covering and protecting the joint surface breaks down, bone spurs can form, and the joint becomes less able to move through it’s full normal range of motion.

Change to bone can create a narrowing of the joint space and can physically block movement causing a joint to feel stiff, ‘locked’ and restricted.

However, the severity of what shows on imaging and a scan bears no reliable relationship to reduction of movement range (how far you can move a joint) and the severity of pain a person experiences, their muscle strength and functional capabilities.

Many people with extensive radiographic changes have minimal symptoms and live a full life.

Many people in severe pain with highly reduced independence have modest imaging findings. The pain reported is real in both cases. 

 

Effect

 

Living with persistent osteoarthritis pain changes everything — quietly, incrementally, and often invisibly to those around you.

Some find that the pain that begins with activity and eases with rest gradually becomes more persistent and harder to shift.

Sleep suffers. Mornings are stiff and slow. Things that used to be unremarkable — walking to the shops, managing stairs, sitting through a meeting, playing with grandchildren — become calculated decisions. Research confirms what people with osteoarthritis already know: the condition does not stay in the joint. Depression affects 12% of people with osteoarthritis, anxiety a further 12.5%, and those experiencing both have significantly worse quality of life than those with osteoarthritis alone. The impact on work is substantial — people with osteoarthritis lose an average of 2.1 potential working life years, through a combination of sick days, reduced productivity, and premature exit from employment. In generalised osteoarthritis affecting multiple joints, the cumulative burden on independence, relationships, mood, and daily function is considerably greater still.

Management

The current UK clinical NICE guideline — recommends that osteoarthritis management be led by therapeutic exercise, education, and behaviour change, with medication playing a supporting role. Exercise tailored to individual need, combining local muscle strengthening with general aerobic activity, remains the most robustly evidenced intervention for reducing pain and improving function — and long-term adherence produces the best outcomes. But exercise alone does not address the full picture. Psychological interventions added to standard care — including cognitive behavioural therapy and pain coping skills training — produce significant improvements in pain and function in osteoarthritis beyond what physical treatment alone achieves. CBT also demonstrably reduces insomnia, fatigue, and depression in people with knee and hip osteoarthritis. Occupational therapy — addressing function, joint protection, activity modification, and daily independence — is a core component of the evidence base, as confirmed by the 2025 American Journal of Occupational Therapy practice guidelines. Pain neuroscience education reduces kinesiophobia, catastrophising, and disability by shifting the patient’s understanding of their pain from a purely structural to a nervous system model — directly relevant in a condition where radiographic findings so frequently fail to explain symptom severity.


Secondary Osteoarthritis

Secondary osteoarthritis develops when a specific condition, injury, or event alters the environment of a joint in ways that accelerate its degeneration. Where primary osteoarthritis has no single cause, secondary osteoarthritis has an identifiable one — prior joint injury or trauma, inflammatory arthritis including rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis, congenital joint abnormalities, metabolic conditions such as haemochromatosis, avascular necrosis, or systemic conditions affecting connective tissue. The most common and clinically significant subtype is post-traumatic osteoarthritis, which accounts for approximately 12% of all osteoarthritis globally. People with a history of significant joint injury are three to six times more likely to develop osteoarthritis and typically receive their diagnosis a decade earlier than those without prior trauma — meaning secondary osteoarthritis frequently affects people still in the middle of their working and family lives, at a stage when its impact is at its most disruptive. 

Effect

Secondary osteoarthritis often carries a particular psychological weight — because it follows something. An accident, a sports injury, a surgical complication, a diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis that was supposed to be managed. There is frequently grief, anger, and a sense of loss of the life and body that existed before. In post-traumatic presentations, the psychological sequelae of the original injury — fear of re-injury, hypervigilance, PTSD-type responses — frequently persist alongside the physical joint changes and independently amplify pain, restrict movement, and undermine rehabilitation engagement. In inflammatory arthritis-related secondary osteoarthritis, pain frequently persists even when inflammatory markers are controlled and disease activity is pharmacologically managed — a finding that points directly to the role of central sensitisation and psychological factors in sustaining pain beyond active inflammation. Work capacity, relationships, independence, and identity are all affected — and in medico-legal practice, secondary osteoarthritis following traumatic injury is one of the most frequently assessed and most complex chronic pain presentations, requiring careful expert analysis of causation, time to onset, and functional impact.

Management

Management of secondary osteoarthritis must address both the structural joint changes and the neurological and psychological factors that have developed alongside them — particularly where the precipitating event was traumatic. NICE NG226 recommends the same foundational approach as for primary osteoarthritis — therapeutic exercise, education, and behaviour change — but in secondary presentations, trauma-informed approaches are frequently also needed. The experience of the original injury, diagnostic journey, and functional loss can itself be psychologically traumatic, and these responses require direct therapeutic attention rather than assuming that physical rehabilitation alone will be sufficient. Physiotherapy targeting strength, range of movement, and functional restoration; occupational therapy addressing daily independence and joint protection; CBT and ACT targeting fear-avoidance, catastrophising, and psychological comorbidity; and pain neuroscience education reconceptualising the pain experience — together form an integrated approach that addresses the full biopsychosocial picture. 


Pre and Post Surgery for OA

Surgery for osteoarthritis — most commonly total knee or hip replacement — is the treatment of choice when pain and functional limitation have not responded adequately to conservative management. It is one of the most frequently performed elective procedures in the UK and globally, with high overall success rates. Yet a significant and persistently underestimated proportion of patients — estimated at 15–30% following total knee arthroplasty — report meaningful dissatisfaction after surgery, with persistent pain, limited functional recovery, and reduced quality of life that the procedure did not resolve. The reasons are now well understood. Pre-operative depression, anxiety, pain catastrophising, kinesiophobia, and central sensitisation are robustly evidenced predictors of worse post-surgical outcomes — irrespective of surgical technique. Equally, inadequate post-operative rehabilitation that addresses only physical recovery without addressing the psychological and nervous system factors determining long-term outcome leaves a significant proportion of patients without the full benefit surgery could have delivered. 

Effect

Persistent pain after joint replacement — sometimes called chronic post-surgical pain — is one of the most distressing and least discussed consequences of osteoarthritis surgery. A person who undergoes a major operation with the expectation of pain relief, who commits to rehabilitation, and who still finds themselves in significant pain months later, faces a specific and compounding burden: the physical pain itself, the loss of the anticipated recovery, the difficulty explaining an outcome that does not match what they were told to expect, and the challenge of navigating a healthcare system that may no longer have a clear pathway for them. Pre-operative psychological state — particularly anxiety, depression, and catastrophising — is one of the strongest predictors of this outcome. Neuroimaging research confirms that central sensitisation present before surgery persists post-operatively when it is not addressed, explaining why a structurally successful procedure fails to resolve pain in a significant subgroup. In medico-legal contexts involving joint replacement complications or persistent post-surgical pain, the relationship between pre-operative psychological state, central sensitisation, and post-surgical outcome is clinically significant and requires specialist assessment. 

Management

The evidence is now clear that what happens before and after osteoarthritis surgery matters as much as the surgery itself. Psychological prehabilitation — delivered before the operation — has been demonstrated across 20 randomised controlled trials to reduce pain, anxiety, depression, and hospital stay, with benefits across all surgical types. Combining physical prehabilitation with psychological preparation optimises readiness for surgery, reduces catastrophising, and improves the post-operative recovery trajectory. Post-operative rehabilitation must address physical recovery — strength, range of movement, return to activity — alongside the central sensitisation, fear of movement, and psychological adjustment that determine long-term outcome. Pain neuroscience education, CBT, graded exposure to movement, occupational therapy targeting return to daily activities and work, and trauma-informed support where the surgical experience or underlying injury has been psychologically significant, together form a comprehensive post-surgical programme. Where surgery has not produced expected relief, specialist persistent pain assessment and management — addressing central and psychological mechanisms — is indicated.


Osteoarthritis Pain

Osteoarthritis pain is not simply joint pain. For many people it becomes a presence that organises their entire life — what they can do, when they can do it, how long they can manage, and what they have to give up. It is also, from a neuroscience perspective, considerably more complex than a damaged joint producing pain signals. A significant subgroup of people with osteoarthritis develop central sensitisation — a state in which the central nervous system becomes hypersensitive, amplifying pain signals, lowering pain thresholds, and producing pain that extends beyond the affected joint and persists independently of the structural changes that triggered it. This central component explains one of the most consistently reported and most confusing features of osteoarthritis: why the scan does not match the suffering. Radiographic severity does not predict symptom severity. Some people with minimal structural changes are in severe, disabling pain. Others with advanced joint destruction remain largely functional. The nervous system — not the joint alone — is constructing the pain experience.

Effect

Osteoarthritis pain that has a significant central sensitisation component does not respond to joint-directed treatment alone — and the failure to recognise this is one of the most significant reasons people remain in pain after conservative management and even after surgery. Central sensitisation in osteoarthritis is associated with greater pain intensity, widespread pain sensitivity, fatigue, sleep disturbance, anxiety, depression, and catastrophising — all of which interact and amplify one another, as confirmed in 2025 research on the multiple symptom burden of knee osteoarthritis. The result is a self-reinforcing cycle: pain drives anxiety, anxiety amplifies central sensitisation, sensitisation makes pain worse. Daily function, independence, relationships, sleep, work capacity, and psychological wellbeing are all affected — and in people whose pain has a dominant central component, the gap between what investigations show and what they are experiencing can itself become a source of distress, self-doubt, and loss of trust in healthcare.

Management

Managing osteoarthritis pain effectively means addressing the nervous system as well as the joint — and the evidence for doing so is substantial. Pain neuroscience education reconceptualises the patient’s understanding of their pain from a structural model to a nervous system model, producing clinically relevant reductions in pain, disability, and kinesiophobia across 12 randomised controlled trials in osteoarthritis and related conditions. CBT and pain coping skills training added to standard care significantly improve both pain and function in knee osteoarthritis beyond physical treatment alone. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy supports patients in living more fully despite pain — reducing avoidance, increasing valued activity, and improving psychological flexibility in ways that demonstrably improve quality of life. Physiotherapy — combining exercise, manual therapy, and movement-based approaches — addresses the physical and neuromuscular contributors to pain, with network meta-analysis confirming the effectiveness of physical therapies for knee osteoarthritis across multiple modalities. Occupational therapy addresses the practical functional consequences of osteoarthritis pain — joint protection, activity adaptation, assistive equipment, and return to work and daily roles. And where trauma, adverse life experience, or significant psychological burden are contributing to the pain experience, trauma-informed and psychologically led approaches address the nervous system dysregulation that standard physical treatment cannot reach alone.

References for this section:

 

Primary Osteoarthritis Description: (1, 2, 3) Effect: (14, 15, 17) Management: (7, 18, 19, 20, 22)

Secondary Osteoarthritis Description: (1, 2, 6) Effect: (1, 6, 14, 17) Management: (1, 6, 7, 19, 22)

Pre and Post Surgery for OA Description: (8, 9, 10) Effect: (8, 9, 10) Management: (7, 8, 9, 18, 19)

Osteoarthritis Pain Description: (11, 12, 13) Effect: (11, 12, 13, 15, 16) Management: (7, 11, 13, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22)

The Modern Whole-Person Approach to Osteoarthritis : Inflammation, Genes, Diet and Light

Osteoarthritis is increasingly understood not as a mechanical wearing down of joints but as a systemic inflammatory disease. This reframing has profound implications for how OA is assessed, managed, and — critically — how it responds to whole-person approaches that go far beyond joint-directed treatment.

OA and Inflammation — The Science

Low-grade inflammation is now recognised as a key mediator of OA pathogenesis — not simply a consequence of joint damage, but a driver of it. Synovitis — inflammation of the joint lining — is present in a significant proportion of OA cases, even those not traditionally classified as inflammatory, and is associated with greater pain, faster joint deterioration, and poorer functional outcome. Immune cells, particularly macrophages, play a central role — their activation states within the joint and the inflammatory cytokines they release determine the pace of cartilage destruction and the intensity of pain. There exists a recognised disconnect between radiographic joint findings and patient symptoms in OA — and inflammation, particularly synovitis, is increasingly put forward as the explanation for why two people with apparently similar joint changes can experience such different levels of pain and disability. 

Erosive osteoarthritis is a distinct and more aggressive subtype, characterised by pronounced synovial inflammation, erosive joint destruction, and substantially greater pain and functional impairment than non-erosive OA. It most commonly affects the interphalangeal joints of the hands and sits in a borderland between primary OA and inflammatory arthritis — and is frequently misdiagnosed or underdiagnosed in clinical practice. For people living with erosive OA, the level of pain and disability is often far greater than their diagnosis suggests to their healthcare team — and it requires a treatment approach that addresses the inflammatory and central sensitisation dimensions together.

Diet, the Gut Microbiome, and Gene Expression

What you eat has a direct and measurable influence on OA — not only through body weight and metabolic load, but through the epigenetic and inflammatory mechanisms that drive joint degeneration and pain at the molecular level. Diet modifies gene expression in OA through epigenetic mechanisms — DNA methylation, histone remodelling, and non-coding RNA activity — that regulate the inflammatory and catabolic mediators responsible for cartilage destruction. Bioactive dietary compounds — phytonutrients found in plant-based foods, polyphenols, omega-3 fatty acids, and anti-inflammatory dietary patterns including the Mediterranean diet — have demonstrated the ability to suppress the expression of inflammatory cytokines and matrix metalloproteinases that degrade cartilage, by directly modulating epigenetic changes in key inflammatory genes. This means that what a person eats is not merely a lifestyle factor in OA — it is biologically active at the level of gene expression in joint tissue. 

The Gut Microbiome sits at the centre of this picture. Gut microbial composition influences systemic inflammation through the production of short-chain fatty acids, regulation of immune cell populations, and modulation of intestinal permeability — and dysbiosis, the disruption of a healthy gut microbial environment, is associated with increased systemic inflammatory burden and accelerated OA progression. The brain-gut axis connects gut health directly to nervous system regulation, pain sensitivity, and psychological wellbeing — and is a key target of the treatment approaches used in this practice.

Mitochondria, Red Light, and Cellular Energy

Emerging longevity science, including work presented at recent Smart Ageing Summit 2026, organized by the Oxford Longevity Project in Oxford, is shining a light — literally — on the role of mitochondrial function in inflammation, cellular health, and pain. Research by neuroscientist Dr Glen Jeffery at University College London demonstrates that long-wavelength red and near-infrared light penetrates body tissues to enhance mitochondrial function, reduce inflammatory cytokine expression, and improve metabolic health at the cellular level. Mitochondrial dysfunction — reduced cellular energy production — is increasingly implicated in OA progression, synovial inflammation, and the systemic metabolic changes associated with both OA and chronic pain. Supporting mitochondrial health through light exposure, diet, movement, and nervous system regulation represents a genuinely integrative dimension of OA management that sits at the cutting edge of longevity and musculoskeletal medicine. (Jeffery, Huberman Lab 2025)

Stress, Trauma, and the Inflammatory Cycle

Psychological stress and nervous system dysregulation do not remain separate from the biology of OA — they are woven into it. Chronic stress activates the HPA axis and sympathetic nervous system, elevating circulating inflammatory cytokines including IL-6 and TNF-alpha that directly amplify synovial inflammation and lower pain thresholds. Adverse life experience and trauma, through epigenetic mechanisms, alter the inflammatory and stress reactivity of the nervous system in ways that are now well documented in the pain and rheumatology literature — increasing vulnerability to both the development and the severity of inflammatory musculoskeletal conditions. This is why two people with the same OA diagnosis, the same joint findings, and the same treatment can have such different experiences — and why effective treatment must address the nervous system, the psychological landscape, and the biological environment together.

The Whole-Person Approach

The convergence of OA inflammation science, nutritional epigenomics, mitochondrial biology, gut-brain research, and pain neuroscience points consistently in the same direction — towards treatment approaches that address the whole person, the whole nervous system, and the full biological and psychological context in which OA develops and is sustained.

Somatic psychotherapeutic approaches and brain-gut directed approaches work directly on the nervous system dysregulation that amplifies inflammation, heightens pain sensitivity, and disrupts the gut microbiome through the brain-gut axis. 

Trauma-informed care addresses the epigenetic and neuroendocrine mechanisms through which adverse experience increases inflammatory burden and pain vulnerability. 

Fractal Feldenkrais — A movement practice that works through neuroplasticity and body awareness to optimise mechanical joint loading — supports nervous system regulation and functional recovery without driving inflammatory flare. 

Emerging evidence on diet, mitochondrial health, and epigenetic modification of inflammatory gene expression provides a biological under-pinning for lifestyle and nutritional guidance that is now imperative in effective OA management.

This is not complementary medicine sitting alongside conventional care. It is the direction that the science is pointing — and it is the foundation of the clinical approach used in my practice.

References for The Modern Whole Person Approach to Osteoarthritis : Inflammation, Genes, Diet and Light

OA and Inflammation: (25, 26) Diet and Gene Expression: (27) Mitochondria and Red Light: (28) Stress, Trauma and Inflammation: (25, 26, 27) Whole-Person Approach: (25, 26, 27, 28)

⚠ Any exercise or physical activity undertaken without prior consultation with a qualified healthcare professional is done at your own risk. The information provided is for general guidance only and does not constitute medical advice. We recommend that you consult a physiotherapist before starting any new exercise or activity and book a consultation to arrange an individualised programme tailored to you.

Osteoarthritis and recovery plans

Recovery: What’s almost always missed?

Yes it’s Trauma and here’s the science bit.

Definition

Trauma is the psychological and physiological response to an event or series of events that is experienced as overwhelming, exceeding an individual’s capacity to cope, and resulting in lasting effects on functioning and wellbeing.(16)

What about genes?

Trauma does not change the DNA sequence, but it can alter gene expression through epigenetic mechanisms (e.g. DNA methylation, stress-hormone regulation), influencing pain sensitivity, inflammation, and stress reactivity. There is strong evidence that early life stress and trauma are associated with long-term changes in the HPA axis, increasing vulnerability to chronic pain and heightened symptom response. This helps explain why individuals with similar structural conditions can present very differently in pain, function, and recovery.(17, 18)

More

Trauma is not only biological; the experience of injury, diagnosis, or loss of identity (e.g. athlete, performer) can itself be psychologically traumatic. Individuals may develop acute stress or PTSD-type responses following accidents or even clinical consultations, particularly where events are sudden, threatening, or life-altering. This can amplify pain, disrupt recovery, and alter engagement with rehabilitation through fear, avoidance, and heightened threat perception.(19, 20)

RETURN TO NORMAL LIFE

If you want a higher quality of life, are open to change and working in fresh, new ways for better future health, do give me a call.

REFERENCES

1. Sen, R. and Hurley, J.A. (2023) ‘Osteoarthritis’, StatPearls. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482326/

2. Salman, L.A., Khera, T., Sheikh, A., Sherif, A. and Khandaker, M.U. (2023) ‘Osteoarthritis: a narrative review of molecular approaches to disease management’, Arthritis Research and Therapy, 25(1). Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9938549/

3. Courties, A., Sellam, J. and Berenbaum, F. (2024) ‘Osteoarthritis year in review 2024: epidemiology and therapy’, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 32(12). Available at: https://www.oarsijournal.com/article/S1063-4584(24)01320-7/pdf

4. Courties, A., Sellam, J. and Berenbaum, F. (2025) ‘Osteoarthritis year in review 2025: epidemiology and therapy’, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1063458425011276

5. Haugen, I.K., Englund, M., Aliabadi, P., Niu, J., Clancy, M., Kvien, T.K. and Felson, D.T. (2014) ‘Prevalence, incidence and progression of hand osteoarthritis in the general population: the Framingham Osteoarthritis Study’, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 70(9). Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4065634/

6. Dilley, J.E., Bello, M.A. and McKinley, T. (2023) ‘Post-traumatic osteoarthritis: pathogenic mechanisms and novel targets’, Bone and Joint Research, 12(10). Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10323219/

7. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2022) Osteoarthritis in over 16s: diagnosis and management. NG226. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng226

8. Hall, A., Ferreira, P., Maher, C., Latimer, J. and Ferreira, M. (2025) ‘Psychological prehabilitation improves surgical outcomes’, Annals of Surgery. Available at: https://www.uclahealth.org/news/article/patients-see-improved-post-surgical-outcomes-with

9. Karimijashni, M., Asadollahi, E., Salehi, R. and Mottaghi, A. (2024) ‘Prehabilitation in patients at risk of poorer outcomes following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review’, Journal of Arthroplasty, 39(12). Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540324011720

10. O’Connor, J.P., Lysaght, J., O’Sullivan, J.N. and McCarthy, G.M. (2022) ‘Preoperative psychological factors and total hip arthroplasty outcomes: a systematic review’, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 17(1). Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9575292/

11. Nijs, J., Lahousse, A., Kapreli, E., Bilika, P., Saraçoğlu, İ., Malfliet, A., Verschueren, S., King, R., Ickmans, K., Elma, Ö. and Yildiz, T.İ. (2021) ‘Nociplastic pain criteria or recognition of central sensitisation? Pain phenotyping in the past, present and future’, Lancet Rheumatology, 3(6). Available at: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanrhe/article/PIIS2665-9913(21)00032-1/fulltext

12. Fingleton, C., Smart, K., Moloney, N., Fullen, B.M. and Doody, C. (2019) ‘Central sensitisation in knee osteoarthritis: relating presurgical brainstem neuroimaging to arthroplasty outcome’, Pain Medicine, 20(6). Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6430421/

13. Curatolo, M. (2024) ‘Central sensitisation and pain: pathophysiologic and clinical insights’, Journal of Pain Research, 16. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10716881/

14. Alwhaibi, M., Alotaibi, A.D., Alhossan, A. and Alhawassi, T.M. (2025) ‘Mental health and health-related quality of life among adults with osteoarthritis: a national population-based study’, PLoS One, 20(6). Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12176145/

15. Mashayekhi, Y., Asghari, A., Rezaei, M. and Ghasemi, A. (2025) ‘Depression and anxiety as predictors of quality of life in osteoarthritis patients’, Cureus, 17(5). Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12498169/

16. Li, G.Z., Zhang, Y., Liu, X. and Wang, J. (2025) ‘Impacts of knee osteoarthritis on pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue and sleep disorders’, Nursing Open, 12(3). Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12231531/

17. Ching, A., Cogan, L., Prior, Y. and Woodward, J. (2023) ‘Biopsychosocial, work-related, and environmental factors affecting work participation in osteoarthritis: systematic review’, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 24(1). Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10262400/

18. Stern, B.Z., Ciro, C.A., Clark, F.A. and Pruski, L.A. (2025) ‘Occupational therapy practice guidelines for nonoperative management of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis’, American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79(3). Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40768376/

19. Phelps, T., Gilby, J., Hosking, J. and Gill, J. (2025) ‘Psychological interventions added to standard care improve pain and function outcomes in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis’, Musculoskeletal Care, 23(2). Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12176529/

20. Lin, H.M., Hsieh, P.S., Chen, N.C., Tsai, C.H., Kuo, W.F., Lee, Y.L. and Hung, K.C. (2023) ‘Impact of cognitive behaviour therapy on osteoarthritis-associated pain, insomnia, depression, fatigue, and physical function: a systematic review and meta-analysis’, Frontiers in Medicine, 9. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9853196/

21. Hann, K.E.J., McCracken, L.M. and Scott, W. (2024) ‘Acceptance and commitment therapy for patients with chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis on psychological outcomes and quality of life’, PMC. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11178235/

22. Zhang, S., Ge, Y., Bi, Z., Li, Y., Bai, C., Zhang, F., Tian, M., Tian, Y., Zhang, K., Li, X. and Zhu, Y. (2025) ‘Effectiveness of physical therapies for patients with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis’, Frontiers in Medicine, 12. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12711732/

23. Berteau, J.P.P. (2024) ‘Systematic narrative review of modalities in physiotherapy for managing pain in hip and knee osteoarthritis’, Medicine, 103(39). Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11441874/

24. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage (2025) ‘Osteoarthritis year in review 2025: rehabilitation and outcomes’. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41175919/

25. Robinson, W.H., Lepus, C.M., Wang, Q., Raghu, H., Mao, R., Lindstrom, T.M. and Sokolove, J. (2016) ‘Low-grade inflammation as a key mediator of the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis’, Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 12(10), pp. 580–592. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5500215/

26. Knights, A.J., Redding, S.J. and Maerz, T. (2023) ‘Inflammation in osteoarthritis: the latest progress and ongoing challenges’, Current Opinion in Rheumatology, 35(2), pp. 128–134. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10821795/

27. Villagrán-Andrade, K.M., Núñez-Carro, C., Blanco, F.J. and de Andrés, M.C. (2024) ‘Nutritional epigenomics: bioactive dietary compounds in the epigenetic regulation of osteoarthritis’, Pharmaceuticals, 17(9), p. 1148. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11434976/

29. Jeffery, G. (2025) ‘Using red light to improve metabolism and the harmful effects of LEDs’, Huberman Lab Podcast, Episode 257, December 2025. Available at: https://www.hubermanlab.com/episode/red-light-to-improve-metabolism-and-harmful-effects-of-led-glen-jeffery

 

Send A Message

Contact me to discuss your needs.

People contact me at many different stages of their osteoarthritis journey. Some are newly struggling with pain and lost confidence, while others have already seen many practitioners and tried multiple approaches without finding a clear way forwards.

To let us meet and help you decide whether my approach may be appropriate for you, I offer a pre-booked twenty minute introductory web call. It is an opportunity to talk through your current situation, previous treatment experiences, goals, and the type of personalised rehabilitation support that I recommend may be most suitable.

By the end of the conversation, you should have a realistic understanding of possible next steps, expected, costs, and whether we feel like the right fit to work together.

I have over forty years of clinical experience working with complex rehabilitation and persistent conditions, including cases where individuals had begun to feel they had exhausted their options. Some of the most rewarding outcomes have involved helping people regain confidence, independence and meaningful function when they believed significant recovery was unlikely.

Consultations are available in Reading, London, online, and through selected UK home visits.